Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pbomar.com

Parker Bomar - Interaction Design, Research, & Fabrication, · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
paulrhayes.com
Paul Hayes - I’m an interaction designer working in government
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
paulmorat.com
Paul Morat
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
renujohnson.com
Renu Johnson - User Experience and Interaction Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
maoqianportfolio.com
Qian Mao — Interaction Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
charvolinmargaux.com
Margaux Charvolin - Interaction designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
patriciadobrindt.com
Patricia Dobrindt – Visual & Interaction Design
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
designitsagoodidea.com
PATRICIA MCDONALD – communication design
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
natashachan.com
Natasha Chan – Visual Communication Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
andreamaffei.com
Andrea Maffei — Interaction Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
animationdesignaward.com
Animation Design Award
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
animationdesigncompetition.com
Animation Design Competition
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
ad-archdesign.com
ARCHDESIGN CUSTOM FABRICATION - Home
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
designtentions.com
Designtentions | Intentional Systems for a Better Future
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
ashcroft-pemberton.com
Ashcroft-Pemberton — A Practice in Interaction Design
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
adamflemmingdesign.com
Adam Flemming - Projection Design - - Reel
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
patrickrodrigues.com
Patrick Rodrigues — Experience & Interaction Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
teshajay.com
Tesha Jay – Design
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
ijhciux.com
IJHCIUX - International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction and UX Design
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.