Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pavelanni.dev

Pavel Anni · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
paveljanda.com
Pavel Janda
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
the-maruf.com
Maruf's
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
alex-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
alexander-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
alexschimpf.dev
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
ashish.me
Ashish Patel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
ashleylavery.com
Ashley Lavery - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
arrontaylor.me
Arron Taylor
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andrewhxue.com
Andrew Xue
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andreasellwanger.com
Andreas Ellwanger
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
derekdemuro.com
Derek Demuro
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
evanm.dev
Evan McIntire
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
igorsaranchuk.com
Igor Saranchuk
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
imarijoyborda.com
Imari Joy C. Borda
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
kfelter.com
Kyle Felter's Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
mancini.io
Christopher Mancini | Problem Solver Who Writes Code
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
pavelgaraev.com
Pavel Garaev
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
nafisazizi.com
Nafis Azizi Riza
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.