Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to paulroho.com

PaulRoho.com - On Developing Software · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
jycos.com
Jycos.com - Software Development
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
loopingbytes.com
loopingBytes : Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
reddingsoftware.com
Redding Software
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
luda9.com
Daniel | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
burcesoft.com
Freelance Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
redjardev.com
Red Jar Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
rebecche.com
Rebecche | Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
relectus.com
Relectus Software Development
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
aneesharama.dev
Portfolio | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
ashleyhynes.com
Splashley - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
abusque.com
abusque - software development
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
ateam-inc.com
A-Team - Software development agency
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
brucezhu.dev
Bruce Zhu - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
danielxu.dev
Daniel Xu - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
ebtikarbarmaji.com
Ebtikar | Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
jtoromats.com
Juan Toro | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
juanjosesoriano.com
Juan Jose | Software developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
mox-dev.dev
Mox Dev | Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.