Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to paulokramer.com

PK Systems — Software development · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
devinreeks.com
Software Development Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
sinanaseri.com
Sina Naseri — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
amitray.dev
Amit Ray — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
chaselester.com
Chase Lester — Software Development Manager · Technologist
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
nakhira.com
Hira Sharker — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
khwandao.com
Khwandao Aitsara — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
devsrus.com
DEVS_R_US | Elite Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
devsoup.com
DevSoup | Software Development | .Net
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
etsub.com
Etsub - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
iginites.com
Iginites | Software Development Studio
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
andreim-dev.com
Andrei Martinenco — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
akshaybenny.com
Akshay Benny | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
ashmitmittal.dev
Ashmit Mittal - Software Development Engineer | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
sixcore.io
Sixcore — Software Development Studio | Web, Mobile, Cloud
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
ankitmalan.tech
Ankit Singh | Senior Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
gomyor.com
Martin - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
alexgladd.dev
Alex Gladd {DEV} - Web and software development
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
narakcode.dev
NarakCODE - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.