Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pauloclins.com

Paulo Lins | Clemson University · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
malleshmpai.com
Mallesh M. Pai | Rice University
1 shared topicseconomy
71match
paulonatenzon.com
Paulo Natenzon
1 shared topicseconomy
69match
rguntin.com
Rafael Guntin — Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
69match
amjakobsen.com
Alexander M. Jakobsen – Associate Professor, Kellogg MEDS, Northwestern University
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
andrewmsimons.com
Andrew M. Simons | Associate Professor, Associate Chair, Department of Economics, Fordham University
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
pbousquet.com
Paul Bousquet | University of Virginia
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
a-leroux.com
Anke Leroux - Monash University
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
paulstainier.com
Paul Stainier – Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Pennsylvania
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
annemburton.com
Anne M. Burton
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
anastasialitina.com
Publications | Anastasia Litina Homepage
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
andreabernini.com
Andrea Bernini
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
kirillponomarev.com
Kirill Ponomarev
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
andyyizhaowang.com
Yizhao (Andy) Wang
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
chinmayakumar.com
Chinmaya Kumar | Azim Premji University
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
pavitragovindan.com
Pavitra Govindan | Academic Website
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
nadine-yamout.com
Home | Nadine Yamout
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
ihlanfeldt.com
Keith Ihlanfeldt – Florida State University Devoe Moore Eminent Scholar and Professor of Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
66match
andrewberryhill.com
Dr. Andrew Berryhill
1 shared topicseconomy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.