Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to paulmathis.dev

Paul Mathis's Jots · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
paulabers.com
Paul Abers
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
paulmueser.com
Paul Müser | Homepage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
paulhoffer.com
Paul Hoffer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
paulisaris.com
Paul Isaris | A Developer's Journey
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
paulgalasti.com
Paul Galasti
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
paul-nameless.com
Paul Nameless
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
charliemathews.com
Charlie Mathews
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
paulhoule.com
Paul Houle home page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
paulzuradzki.com
Home - Paul Zuradzki
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
paulalwin.dev
Hey there! Paul here.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
paullassen.com
Home - Paul Lassen's Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
pault.com
Paul Tchistopolskii homepage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
asciimath.org
AsciiMath
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
paulweichhart.com
The education of Paul Weichhart
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
paulgieskeblog.com
Paul's Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
paulmains.com
Words by Paul
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
andrezsanchez.com
Software, mathematics, language, and more.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
2timv.com
2timv, pythagorean, summation, mathematics
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.