Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to paulgellai.dev

Home | Paul Gellai Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
paulkwon.com
Home | Paul Kwon
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
paulracisz.com
Paul Racisz | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
paulaanayar.com
Paula Anaya | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
sksoftware.app
SK Software | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
pedrorfdez.com
Pedro Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
alexarraiza.dev
Alex's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
kiannoctor.com
Kian's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
andriyoga.com
Andri Yoga | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
marioluis.dev
Mario Luis | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
thanhorama.com
Thanh Tran | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
aryankashyap.com
Aryan's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
amirabasyouni.com
Amira's Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
slammins.com
Steve's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
petehwu.dev
Welcome to my Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
anupamguptacal.com
Anupam's Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
anasalakkad.com
Anas Alakkad | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
demicapps.com
Home - Stephen Spann Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
manrajsaran.com
Manraj Saran | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.