Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to paulajohnson.com

Paula Johnson – Writing + Comedy · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
brucejohnsonfiction.com
Bruce Johnson – Fiction Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
juliefison.com
Julie Fison – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
aarontnelson.com
Home – Writing Stories that Matter
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
abigailjohnsonbooks.com
Abigail Johnson – YA Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
julieandersonwriter.com
Julie Anderson – Writer and author
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
annastvincent.com
Anna St. Vincent – Writing the Odd Story
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
alexhornwriting.com
Alex Horn Writing
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
gabriellezevin.com
Gabrielle Zevin – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
alanbrunstrom.com
Alan Brunstrom, Author Site – Writing for Smart Mammals Everywhere
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
bymorganvega.com
Morgan Vega – writing, reading, and editing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
andy-southall.com
Andy Southall – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
andysouthall.com
Andy Southall – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
fusilliwriting.com
Fusilli Writing – Flash fiction – short with a twist.
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
jsmusings.com
J's Musings – Writing is more than just words
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
3writingchicks.com
Three Writing Chicks
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
juneosullivanwriter.com
June O'Sullivan – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
craig-carey.com
Craig Carey – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
andrewglockhartwriter.com
Magda Green Books – Love Reading – Love Writing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.