Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pattigully.com

Patti Gully | Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
sisdeans.com
Sis Deans | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
kimliggett.com
Kim Liggett | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
dianemunier.com
Diane Munier | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
mariacaponi.com
Maria Caponi | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
marina-evans.com
Marina Evans | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
angelalgold.com
Angela L Gold | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
bevbeckauthor.com
bevbackauthor | author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
dianneromain.com
Dianne Romain | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
ettenigsayambooks.com
Ettenig Sayam | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
khloeolivera.com
Khloe Olivera | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
manjularao.com
B Manjula Rao | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
cameldoc.co.uk 🇬🇧
Carolyn Ellis | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
allanstratton.com
Allan Stratton | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
aneliaschutte.com
Anelia Schutte | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
denicevickers.com
Denice Vickers | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
esthersanniauthor.com
Esther L Sanni | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
andreayarbough.com
Andrea Yarbough | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
chelseabanning.com
Chelsea Banning | author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.