Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to patrikur.dev

Patrikur.dev – Web Developer in Reykjavík · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
ethan-chiu-portfolio.com
Ethan Chiu – Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
abya.dev
abya.dev — Aby Antony · Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
ilhamportfolio.com
Ilham Dyki – Web Developer & Data Analyst
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
sjwebdevelopers.com
SJ WEB DEVELOPERS
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
estelzhao.com
Ting | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
kilianpeyron.com
Kilian Peyron | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
anggahermawan.com
Angga Hermawan | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
khiuslogistic.com
Khius – Web Developer from Somewhere
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
andypalmer.me
Andy Palmer - Web Developer in Exeter, Devon
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
chikinlee.com
Web Developer in Winnipeg | Chi Kin Lee
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
betimsadiku.com
Betim Sadiku — Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
albertho.me
AlbertHo.dev – Web developer and IT specialist
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
ankushj.dev
Ankush Joshi | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
axw.dev
Andrew Walker - Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
ammarabousaad.com
Ammar Abou Saad | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
aneeqazam.com
Aneeq Azam | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
deniscatalin.com
Denis Catalin | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
igorpravdic.com
Web developer | Igor Pravdic
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.