Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to patricklauher.com

Patrick Lauher · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
patricksudo.com
Patrick Su
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
patrickhe.com
Patrick He
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
patrickguha.com
Patrick Guha
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
patrickshao.com
Patrick Shao
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
patrickbrodie.com
Patrick Brodie
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
patrickspieker.com
Patrick Spieker
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
patrickjdufour.com
Patrick J Dufour
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
patrickjed.com
Patrick Jedrzejko
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
patrickdt.com
Patrick D. Tirtapraja
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
patpadgett.com
About Patrick Padgett
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
patrickmn.com
Patrick Mylund Nielsen
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
patrickkrusiec.com
About · Patrick Krusiec
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
patrickocheja.com
About me - Patrick Ocheja
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
patyoon.com
Patrick Yeo Ho Yoon's Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
patriciabrun.com
Patricia BT |
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
patriciabt.com
Patricia BT |
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
patrickbogucki.com
Patrick Bogucki - Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
patriciobunt.com
Patricio Bunt
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.