Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to patrickkoegel.com

Patrick Koegel - Product Strategy Partner · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
events2profits.com
profit-flow-automations
1 shared topicsbusiness
68match
5raisins.com
5Raisins | Strategic Partnerships
1 shared topicsbusiness
68match
andrecolmenero.com
André Colmenero | Digital Transformation · Product Strategy
1 shared topicsbusiness
68match
advisorgrowthgroup.com
Strategic Partner Network
1 shared topicsbusiness
68match
ignitesp.com
Home | Ignite Strategic Partners
1 shared topicsbusiness
68match
ignitestrategicpartners.com
Home | Ignite Strategic Partners
1 shared topicsbusiness
68match
pavan-rad.com
Pavan Radhakrishnan - Product Design & Strategy | Enterprise Experiences
1 shared topicsbusiness
67match
arkgarden.net
Ark Garden | Product Management Partner
1 shared topicsbusiness
67match
axiomsystem.app
Axiom — Strategic Thinking Partner
1 shared topicsbusiness
67match
chendahan.com
Chen Dahan - Product Manager
1 shared topicsbusiness
66match
imjered.com
Jered Snyder - Product Designer
1 shared topicsbusiness
66match
sitorise.com
Sitorise: Productivity Partnerships for Creators | Sitorise
1 shared topicsbusiness
66match
thearuneshk.com
Arunesh Kumar — Product Manager | Growth & Digital Strategy
1 shared topicsbusiness
66match
godesqsites.com
Strategic Partners and Alliances INC
1 shared topicsbusiness
66match
acuvstrategy.com
Acuv Strategy
1 shared topicsbusiness
66match
mainspringproduct.com
Mainspring Product Solutions
1 shared topicsbusiness
66match
paymentproducts.net
Payment Products | The Payment Partner That Owns the Problem
1 shared topicsbusiness
66match
restonstrategygroup.com
Reston Strategy Group
1 shared topicsbusiness

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.