Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to patrickjude.com

Patrick Jude - Data Scientist and Problem Solver · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
alexdvorak.net
Alex Dvorak | Data Scientist
1 shared topicsdatabases
68match
adrianfrings.com
Adrian Frings | Data Scientist
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
mponsclo.com
Marcel Pons — Senior Data Scientist · Barcelona
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
pablomopa.com
Pablo M. - Data Science & Engineering
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
lorenzosantarelli.com
Lorenzo Santarelli | Data Analyst & Junior Data Scientist
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
adssrn.org
Africa Data Science and Statistics Research Network
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
junho-eum-datascience.com
JUNHOEUM Data Science Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
anhuynh.org
An Huynh · Data Science Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
datalika.co.uk 🇬🇧
Datalika - Data Solutions
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
panendata.com
Panendata - Data Scrapping
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
ashrike.tech
Ashish Kumar | Data Science Enthusiast
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
achrafmansari.com
Achraf Mansari | Data Science Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
bubulkaanalytics.com
Michael Bubulka - Analytics & Data Science Projects
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
paddycull.com
Patrick Cull
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
e1datascience.co.uk 🇬🇧
E1 Data Science Ltd. - Bring Your Data Into Life
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
acooke.dev
Aaron Cooke - Data Engineer
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
acookie.dev
Aaron Cooke - Data Engineer
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
juvaana.com
Juvaana - Tanzania's Premier Data Science Platform
1 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.