Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to patrickjamesdev.com

Patrick James · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
patrickelhage.com
Patrick El-Hage
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
patricksy.com
Patrick Sy
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
patrickrepaci.com
Patrick Repaci
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
euanfitzpatrick.com
Euan Fitzpatrick
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
patrickprioletti.com
Patrick Prioletti
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
patrickpuga.com
Patrick Puga | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
andrewgalvan.com
Andrew Galvan
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
paulmorris.dev
Paul Morris - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
alexbackfish.dev
alexander backfish
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
patkellyengineering.com
👋 Hi, I'm Patrick | Notion
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
patrickalvarez.com
Patrick Alvarez Eades | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
patricksantino.com
Patrick Santino - Software engineer, avid reader, and rookie gamer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
patricksys.dev
Patrick Rossello - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
adamgarling.me
Adam Garling
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
chasezimmy.com
Chase Zimmerman
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
chasezimmerman.com
Chase Zimmerman
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
patrickmazurek.com
Patrick Mazurek's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
patrickbeasley.com
Patrick Beasley | Full-Stack Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.