Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to patrickgonet.com

Patrick Gonet - Product Design Leader at Large · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
patriciflores.com
Patrici Flores - Product Design Lead
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
chardewolfe.com
Char de Wolfe - Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
dennis-ux.com
Dennis O'Neil | Product design leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
ikowilson.com
i.ko Wilson • Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
annaarteeva.com
Anna Arteeva — Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
patriciapuno.com
Patricia Puno - Product Designer & Leader Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
adamhaas.net
Adam Haas – Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
patriciatse.com
Patricia Tse - Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
anastasiamunsell.com
Anastasia Munsell | Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
mansoorfahmeed.com
Mansoor Fahmeed — Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
aaronlee.me
Aaron Lee - Product Designer & Team Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
nadeemsportfolio.com
Nadeem Visanji – Design leader and product designer
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
patriborrallo.com
Patricia Borrallo - Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
amritadesmet.com
Amrita Desmet - Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
annasunhub.com
ANNA - Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
ikramfaidzal.com
Ikram Faidzal – Product Design Leader & Strategy
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
andrewkeser.com
Andrew Keser - Digital Product Design Leader in NYC
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
simonlauwerier.com
Simon Lauwerier | Product Design Lead
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.