Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to patrickgleeson.com

Patrick Gleeson (Author) · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
paulagleeson.com
Paula Gleeson – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
patriciajricketts.com
Patricia Ricketts, Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
patriciabyrneauthor.com
Patricia Byrne, Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
patrickokeeffe.com
Patrick O'Keeffe
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
patricekasimov.com
Patrice Kasimov – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
patriciagibney.com
Patricia Gibney – Irish Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
patriciaanneharris.com
Patricia Anne Harris | Author
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
patrickblennerhassett.com
Patrick Blennerhassett – Journalist and Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
patricia-powell.com
Patricia Powell
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
paulsonwriter.com
Tim Paulson | Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
abbyleighwilson.com
Abby-Leigh Wilson | Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
amy-barry.com
Amy Barry – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
patriciagilkerson.com
Patricia Gilkerson – Children's Book Author
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
patricialoganbooks.com
Patricia Logan
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
pegdaniels.com
Peg Daniels – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
glendayoungbooks.com
Novels | Glenda Young, Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
patricefrantzauthor.com
Patrice Frantz: Author and Freelance Writer | Patrice Frantz
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
aarongransby.com
English Author
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.