Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to patrickcoombe.com

Official Website of Patrick Coombe · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
andrewbernauer.com
A Hugo website
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
79match
anewsystem.com
A New System.com • Website Requirements Wizard
3 shared topicsweb-development
79match
andrewhalper.com
Andrew Halper – Andrew Halper's Website
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
78match
pchabits.com
PCHabits – Application and WordPress them and website development
3 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ancientsolar.com
Testsite I9H8
3 shared topicsweb-development
77match
site-drive.com
Site Drive - Home
3 shared topicsweb-development
76match
2ngsolutions.com
Welcome to SiteName | SiteName
3 shared topicsweb-development
76match
devorbitlabs.com
DevOrbit | Celestial Precision in Digital Experiences
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
akross.dev
[ home@akross:/ ]
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
aldercy.com.my
ALDERCY
3 shared topicsweb-development
75match
andrewrknotts.com
Andrew Knotts
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
andrewtowner.com
Blog
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
angusshields.com
Angus [Gus]
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
75match
a1ec.dev
Home | Alec
3 shared topicsweb-development
75match
arcticwarmth.net
ArcticWarmth
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
armchairshotgun.com
Broad Latitude
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
75match
arpluginshop.com
ARPluginshop – WordPress Plugins
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
75match
arthurjohnsondesign.com
Broad Latitude
3 shared topicsweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.