Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to patrickbeighle.com

Patrick Beighle Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
andycquach.com
Andy Quach — Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
69match
chenshaokun.com
Shawn Chen Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
3sunsinc.com
Devin Blong - Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
charlesromeis.com
Charles Romeis | Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
alecskriloff.com
Alec Skriloff's Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
euniceawoyemi.com
Eunice – Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
chrisdover.com
Chris Dover — Founder Build Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
dennjenn.com
Dennis Jenn Portfolio | Dennis Jenn
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
andodagienterprises.com
Andodagi Enterprises | Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
aneeshbond.com
Aneesh Bond - Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
naomikasbekar.com
Naomi Kasbekar — Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
100indiebets.com
100 Indie Bets: Divyanshu's Indie App Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
namansr.com
Naman Sarawagi – Product. Marketing. Startups.
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
renifulmer.com
Reni Fulmer | Product Manager
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
namecrafts.com
NameCrafts.com | Premium Domain Name Portfolio - Buy AI, Crypto & Tech Domains
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
namescraft.com
NameCrafts.com | Premium Domain Name Portfolio - Buy AI, Crypto & Tech Domains
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
pegflag.com
Portfolio — The CrowdSmith Foundation
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
patrickseibold.com
Patrick Seibold Blog – Thoughts on innovation, product development, strategy, startups and more
1 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.