Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to patrickarobinson.com

Patrick Robinson · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
jtbennett.com
John Bennett
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
buckleyrobinson.com
Buckley Robinson · Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
buckrobinson.com
Buckley Robinson · Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
atrionlabs.com
Atrion Labs
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
hongyuancao.com
Hong Yuan Cao | Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
javacontractor.co.uk 🇬🇧
Trevor Hinson – Software Engineering
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
andrewchyde.com
Andrew Hyde
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
bunevicius.com
Vytautas Bunevičius
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
abmatar.com
Abrahim Matar | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
ecdevv.dev
Eric Chour | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
gabeliss.dev
Gabriel Liss | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
abhyudaysharma.dev
Abhyuday Sharma | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
btuckerc.dev
Tucker Craig - Applied AI & Systems
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
agenticexpert.ai
AgenticExpert — Agentic Engineering Insights
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
ftech-it.com
AI systems, development .NET-based software with Ftech-It
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
atmanshah.com
Atman Shah
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
andrewliu.org
Andrew Liu — Software Engineer, UC Berkeley
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
sirrusai.com
SirrusAI
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.