Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to patosgroup.com

PATOS GROUP · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
ebosgroup.com
Home - EBOS Group
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
68match
mukawercastle.com
Al-Qand Group
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
68match
eldanlab.com
Neopharm Group
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
68match
mpharmagp.com
MPharma Group.
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
68match
ekccounting.com
EKC | IMA Group
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
68match
ekcpharmacycounter.com
EKC | IMA Group
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
67match
effigel.com
Home - IBSA Group
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
67match
silandyl.com
Home - IBSA Group
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
67match
sohigroup.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - Sohi Group
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
66match
thaiger-pharma.com
Thaiger Pharma Group
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
66match
egroupuk.com
EGROUP UK LTD
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
65match
abusheikhads.com
Home | Abu Sheikha Group
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
65match
ecobliss.com
Ecobliss Packaging Group
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
65match
cranemdg.com
Home - CRANE MEDICAL GROUP
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
65match
alfahorsegrp.com
Alfahorse - Alfahorse Group
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
64match
rebornindia.com
Reborn India | Diversified Business Group
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
64match
lotustechnicals.com
Lotus Group - Specialized in Pharmaceutical Industry
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry
64match
lotustechnotrade.com
Lotus Group - Specialized in Pharmaceutical Industry
1 shared topicspharmaceutical-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.