Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to patjs.com

Patrick Stephens, Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
andynewman.dev
Andy Newman - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
alejandrovecchio.dev
Alejandro Vecchio | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
alfunkso.net
Alfonso Cornejo – Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andrewdeck.dev
Andrew Deck | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
manuelviscarra.com
Manuel Viscarra | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
nadimayoub.com
Nadim Ayoub — Software Engineer / UI-UX
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
angierodriguez.dev
Angie Rodriguez | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
chheung.com
chheung — software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
evanwellens.com
Evan Wellens, Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
denysnunez.com
Denys Nunez | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
abdul-wahhab.com
Abdul Wahhab | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
angelumeh.com
Angel Umeh | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
angelumeh.dev
Angel Umeh | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andriyn.tech
Andri Yani - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
cheekane.com
Brian Park — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
derrickmuturi.com
Derrick Muturi - Software Engineer and Web developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
renzoromeo.dev
Renzo Romeo | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
akshaymondal.com
Akshay Mondal - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.