Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pathawks.com

Pat Hawks · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
nathagey.com
Nat Hagey | SWE
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
thathow.com
That How
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
pathartley.com
Pat Hartley - SH2 | Shawn Hartley
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
patmyron.com
Pat Myron
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
chasewoith.com
chasewoith
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
anikethanda.com
Aniket Handa
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
kielbasa.dev
Dawid Kielbasa
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
pashapourmand.com
Pasha Pourmand
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
patpetersen.com
Pat Petersen -
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
angelv.dev
Angel Velasquez
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
8bithackshack.com
8 Bit Hack Shack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
patgarnertech.com
Pat Garner Tech Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
pbeirne.com
Pat Beirne's Home Page
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
arafathasan.com
Arafat Hasan - Software Engineer & Problem Solver
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
patmarinich.com
Pat Marinich | About Me
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
simplyhawk.com
Simply Hawk – Insights on Tech, Business & Lifestyle
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
andrewmohawk.com
Andrew Mohawk · Andrew Mohawk
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
angzarr.io
When Things Go Wrong, Can You Prove What Happened? | ⍼ Angzarr
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.