Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to patfarnach.com

Pat Farnach | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
gouthams.dev
Goutham S - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
aaronjasperson.com
Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
renzoromeo.dev
Renzo Romeo | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
angelumeh.com
Angel Umeh | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
angelumeh.dev
Angel Umeh | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
denysnunez.com
Denys Nunez | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
aaandrangom.dev
Anthony Andrango | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
anestiandoni.com
Anesti Andoni | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
anishjoe.com
Anish Joe | Software Engineer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
gopalarya.com
Gopal Arya | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
adrianlara.org
Adrian Lara | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
aalenoza.com
Aaron Zamora | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
abhisheksharma.me
Abhishek Sharma | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
arikchowdhury.com
Arik Chowdhury | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ifeanyi.dev
Ifeanyi | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
simonesiega.com
Simone Siega | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
akshaymondal.com
Akshay Mondal - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andrewdeck.dev
Andrew Deck | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.