Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to patbriggs.com

Pat Briggs's Personal Site and Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
egeural.com
Ege Ural | Personal Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andronachi09.com
andronachi09 | Personal portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
alcassab.net
Ahmed's Personal Website
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
eguyot.dev
Evan Guyot's Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
lucasarden.com
Lucas Arden's Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
abuffseagull.dev
ABuffSeagull's Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
atema.dev
Martijn Atema's Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
jrodcode.dev
Home - JRodCode Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
justinbenito.com
Justin | Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
lubien.dev
Lubien · Portfolio
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
andrewlethbridge.com
Andrew Lethbridge's Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
by-ced.dev
Ced's Portfolio | Web Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
juan-estrad.com
Juan Estrada Portfolio Website
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
looank.com
Projects - My Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
luka-udovicic.com
Luka Udovicic Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
silviu.dev
Silviu Glavan | Personal website
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
bruceyulin.com
Bruce Yu Lin | Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
simonrosset.com
Simon Rosset - Portfolio
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.