Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pat-b.com

Pat B — Senior Product Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
86match
nandosadi.com
Nando — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
82match
designthewebb.com
Stephen Webb — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
82match
ashishkhoshya.com
Ashish Khoshya — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
81match
teresaedward.com
Teresa Edward — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
81match
andymovespixels.com
Andy Chu — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
81match
renatavalentini.com
Renata Valentini — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
80match
terrenceokafor.com
Terrence Okafor — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
80match
ikhbayar.com
Ikemari | Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
80match
kishoresv.com
Kishore — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
80match
adamlowrydesign.com
Adam Lowry — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
79match
angelaechu.com
Angela Chu — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
79match
designwithyosi.com
Moroluwayosi Adewumi — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
79match
devasath.com
Sree Divya — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
79match
alexpwindsor.com
Alex Windsor — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
79match
andrewapierce.com
Andrew Pierce | Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
79match
ani-mccurnin.com
Ani McCurnin - Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
79match
paulinenidea.com
Pauline Nidea | Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
78match
ignacioospina.com
Ignacio Ospina, Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.