Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pastcaring.com

Paul N Brown's WEB Index · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
chicagosouthshore.com
Chicago's South Shore index
1 shared topicshistory
66match
kiddielandremembered.com
Cheryl Brown
1 shared topicshistory
65match
a1historydunbar.com
A1 History Dunbar: Index
1 shared topicshistory
65match
anhistoriersmiscellany.com
An Historier's Miscellany – A broad landscape of archaeology, history and heritage.
1 shared topicshistory
65match
admiralbrown.com
Home | Admiral Brown
1 shared topicshistory
65match
ancientmoons.com
Ancient Moons Index
1 shared topicshistory
64match
the-past.com
The Past – History / Archaeology / Heritage / Ancient World
1 shared topicshistory
64match
paulsedra.com
Paul Sedra
1 shared topicshistory
64match
skokienewspaperindex.com
Skokie Newspaper Index
1 shared topicshistory
64match
designandarchaeology.com
designandarchaeology | Design and Archaeology
1 shared topicshistory
64match
retrospectjournal.com
Retrospect Journal – EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY'S HISTORY, CLASSICS AND ARCHAEOLOGY MAGAZINE
1 shared topicshistory
63match
bethshalom.com
The Beth Shalom Web Centre
1 shared topicshistory
63match
acklandwater.org
The Main Index for MYTHS.COM
1 shared topicshistory
63match
arlingtonwomenshistory.org
Women's Work
1 shared topicshistory
63match
arlingtonwomenshistory.net
Women's Work
1 shared topicshistory
63match
arlingtonwomenshistory.com
Women's Work
1 shared topicshistory
63match
adnd-campaigns.org
The Main Index for MYTHS.COM
1 shared topicshistory
63match
nanre.com
The Main Index for MYTHS.COM
1 shared topicshistory

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.