Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to passig.com

Prof. David Passig | Futures Studies · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
annatinaaerne.com
Annatina Aerne
1 shared topicseducation
66match
ethknoworks.com
Ethknoworks LLC - Home Base
1 shared topicseducation
66match
1000students.com
1000 Students | From HOPE to a Future
1 shared topicseducation
65match
dengkaixin.com
Kaixin Deng's Homepage
1 shared topicseducation
65match
annayaghobova.com
Anna Yaghobová
1 shared topicseducation
65match
better-futures.com
Better Futures Foundation - With Compassion We Create Better Futures
1 shared topicseducation
65match
evawoodspeiro.com
Eva Woods Peiró – Professor of Hispanic Studies
1 shared topicseducation
64match
bgccollier.com
Boys & Girls Club of Collier County | Great Futures Start Here
1 shared topicseducation
64match
glorionfuture.com
GLORION FUTURE
1 shared topicseducation
64match
achildafuture.org
A Child A Future
1 shared topicseducation
64match
mainestudies.com
Home - mainestudies
1 shared topicseducation
64match
aaastudies.org
Home - Association for Asian American Studies
1 shared topicseducation
64match
1stgenfuturelab.org
First Gen FutureLab
1 shared topicseducation
64match
bfetrust.com
Brighter Futures Educational Trust – BFET
1 shared topicseducation
64match
biffinstitute.com
Black & Indigenous Feminist Futures Institute – Mellon Funded Intersectional Studies Collective at UVA
1 shared topicseducation
64match
larwoodacademytrust.co.uk 🇬🇧
Brighter Futures Educational Trust – BFET
1 shared topicseducation
64match
akshatchaudhary.com
Hola | こんにちは | Bonjour | नमस्ते - Akshat Chaudhary
1 shared topicseducation
64match
albanianstudies.org
The Society for Albanian Studies
1 shared topicseducation

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.