Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to passableco.de

Home · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
softblocks.de 🇩🇪
Home
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
socialvid.de 🇩🇪
Home
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
smart-amps.com
Home
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
smart-amps.de 🇩🇪
Home
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
smart-electronics.de 🇩🇪
Home
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
oneworldonemedicine.de 🇩🇪
CakePHP(tm) : Home
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
rubyblog.de 🇩🇪
Ruby Blog | Coding, Apps, Ruby und Ruby on Rails
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
pfoffie.dev
Pfoffie.dev programmiert dir alles.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
alexgamingdev.tech
Alexander Dennhoven | Software Architect & Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
pevelopment.com
PE | Ein Blog über Softwareentwicklung von Ema & Patrick
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
php-einfach.de 🇩🇪
PHP lernen – PHP lernen leicht gemacht
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
networkingpros.net
overdestructively Lithesomeness xylography polyonymic rewardedly
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
ackermann.digital
Daniel Ackermann
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
alexander-kruska.dev
Portfolio - Alexander Kruska
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
birck.org
TB-Ware - Visual Basic & PHP-Scripte von Torben Birck
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
60match
bodewig.dev
Lars Bodewig - Bodewig.dev
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
fanstoss.com
piganis.de - Thomas Butzbach
2 shared topicsweb-development
60match
faruk.dev
Faruk Varal | TypeScript / React / Next.js Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.