Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pasamaroy.com

Pasamar Oy - Industrial Design & Creative Services · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
fromindustrialdesign.com
FROM INDUSTRIAL DESIGN
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
andymasondesign.co.uk 🇬🇧
andy mason / industrial designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
amalnair.com
Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
francoboffi.com
Franco Boffi - Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
manonlesant.com
Manon Le Sant - industrial designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
3layersstudio.com
3 Layers Studio – Industrial Design Services
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
annu.me
Annuai | Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
marcelsigel.com
marcel sigel | industrial design studio
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
kengoarai.com
Kengo Arai — Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
synertiadesign.com
73ten & SynertiaDesign, LLC - Strategic Industrial & Graphic Design Services
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
sarahperoni.com
SARAH PERONI — Design & Creative Direction
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
alexgordondesign.co.uk 🇬🇧
Alex Gordon | Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
manudelater.com
Manu Delater - Freelance Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
saraberrino.com
Sara Berrino – Industrial Design – Illustration
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
adprofile.co.uk 🇬🇧
AD Profile Creative Design
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
sarahsung.com
Creative Graphic Design Services — Sung & Co
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
kddesignid.com
Industrial – Industrial Design: Product Design and Commercial Art
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
tovbar.com
BarTov | Design & Creative
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.