Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to parkjan.com

Jan Park | Game Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
cameronconnick.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cameron Connick | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
77match
bwgamedesign.com
Bryce Williams | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
thalesrebelo.com
Thales Rebelo - Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
gameofarbor.com
Jesse Kroon | Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
geertnellen.com
- Geert Nellen - game designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
gavineo.dev
Gavin Parr - Game Designer & Producer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
julianstables.com
Julian Stables Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
gabrielhector.com
Gabriel Hector | Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
munchworksstudios.com
Evan Kawa | Game Design and Programming
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
gerolagasammyabigail.com
Sammy Gerolaga | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
owenbassdesign.com
Owen Bass – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
gamedesignstudiohf.com
Game Designer | Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
button-masher.net
Andrew Weldon: Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
gamedesignweek.com
Game design Week
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
getgamedesign.com
Get Game Design -
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
gamedesignroulette.com
Game Design Roulette
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
gamedesignerwannabe.com
Game Designer Wannabe
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
gamedesigndude.com
Shellbound Devlog | Game Design Dude
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.