similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to parkervcp.com

parkervcp (Michael (Parker) Parker) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

michaelsabo (Michael Sabo) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Lioness100 · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

eigenpaul (paul) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

jsparkdev (Junseong Park) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

pierre (Pierre-Alexandre Meyer) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

adamgauthier (Adam Gauthier) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

AterraEngine · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

owdevel (Owen Mak) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

andrewlmartin.dev

AndrewR3K (Andrew) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

lucashecht (Lucas Hecht) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

lucaspetrini.com

lfpetrini (Lucas Petrini) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Redite · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

raphaelabrantes (Raphael Abrantes ) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

dgaidula (Dan Gaidula) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

adsenseexperts.org

hparadiz (Henry Paradiz) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

adammck (Adam Mckaig) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

vankxr (João Silva) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

JuanjoFR (Juanjo Fernández) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.