Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to papafe.dev

Papafe · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
alexlazcano.dev
Alex Lazcano
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
agingdeveloper.net
The Aging Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
asyncadventures.com
Async Adventures
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
hjjacobs.com
Hendrik Jacobs
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
thatbrothacodes.com
thatbrothacodes | Software development from a brotha's perspective
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
adamreidelbach.com
Adam Reidelbach
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
overstated.dev
Home | Overstated
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
angry-dev-thoughts.com
Angry dev thoughts - Software developers are sometimes angry
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
hitaesh.com
Hitaesh's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
agilecoder.org
AgileCoder.net
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
juancwu.dev
Juan Wu | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
fuabioo.com
Fabio Mora
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewemerson.io
Andrew Emerson
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
aleksandrhovhannisyan.com
Aleksandr Hovhannisyan
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
juraskrlec.com
juraskrlec | Another site about software development. Hope you’re having a great day :)
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
bupit.com
Bupit.com - Your Tech Resource
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
justabeech.com
Morten Bøgh
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
3xion.dev
Nolan Stone
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.