similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to paofranco.com

Paofranco alternatives & similar sites

Paolo Franco, PhD | Consumer Culture Researcher & Marketing Academic — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Marketing And Advertising →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
joesiev.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Joe Siev — Consumer Behavior Researcher	en	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 13
usenns.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Neuromarketing Platform for Consumer Insights Research	ES~ en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lucasbxavier.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Lucas B. Xavier · Marketing Researcher	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aviantsvoice.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Consumer marketing research panel \| AviantsVoice \| United States	en	marketing-and-advertising Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denishshah.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Denish Shah - Marketing Professor and Researcher	en	marketing-and-advertising Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
actionconsumermarketing.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Action Consumer Marketing (ACM)	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zzajil.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Five-V for Marketing Research and Consultancies	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
acnlabs.co.uk ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	ACN: Applied Consumer Neuroscience Research	GB en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
absoluteresearch.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Home - Absolute Marketing & Research, LLC	en	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
averanita.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Experienced Researcher in UX and Consumer Research Indonesia \| Amanda Ve	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luma-media.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Luma Media \| Content & Marketing for Plastic Surgeons	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samogborn.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Marketing, Platforms, & Consumer Behavior \| Sam Ogborn	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
advantageresearch.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Full Service Marketing Research - Advantage Research Services, Inc.	en	marketing-and-advertising WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
use-saral.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	SARAL - Influencer Marketing Platform for Consumer Brands	en	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
usdatacorporation.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	US Data Corporation \| Business & Consumer Marketing Lists	en	marketing-and-advertising WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
usehashting.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hashting - Direct-to-Consumer Marketing Promotions Platform	en	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
absolute-future.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Absolute Future – IT & Marketing	en	marketing-and-advertising WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demandbrew.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Marketing Operations Best Practices & Research	en	marketing-and-advertising WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.