Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pamsegall.com

Pam Segall – Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
ashleyyoungwrites.com
Ashley Young – Portfolio
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
72match
rebeccathandinorman.com
Rebecca Thandi Norman – Portfolio
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
72match
adamsergott.org
- Writing Portfolio
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
71match
ashley-glenn.com
Ashley Glenn Portfolio
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
70match
juliwrites.com
Portfolio – Juliana Fischer
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
70match
ebeltang.com
Ebel Tang's Portfolio
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
70match
caitlinroseflynn.com
Caitlin Flynn - Writing Portfolio
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
70match
andrewgrayjournalist.com
Andrew Gray - Writing Portfolio
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
70match
ashawrites.net
Writing Portfolio - Home
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
69match
courtelliott.com
Courtney Voegele's Portfolio
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
69match
sierratierra.com
Lisa Kalner Williams Portfolio
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
69match
caitlinpfry.com
Portfolio / Caitlin Fry
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
69match
justinecostigan.com
Justine Costigan - Writing Portfolio
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
69match
thebalancedbyline.com
The Balanced Byline – A Digital Media Portfolio
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
69match
adamkrause.net
Adam Krause – Writing Portfolio
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
69match
rehannrheel.com
Rehann Rheel's Portfolio
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
69match
jrowenportfolio.com
Copywriting Portfolio
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing
69match
lorianncurran.com
LoriAnnCurran – Portfolio Lori Ann Curran
1 shared topicsfreelance-writing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.