Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pakdevstudio.com

Pak Dev Studio | Futuristic Software Team · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
akmsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
AKM Software
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
louispham.dev
Louis Pham | Software Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
padilha.io
Padilha Software House
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andyberger.dev
Andy Berger | Software Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
red-box-software.com
Red Box Software
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
a-dappt.com
Osler Hutson | Full-Stack Software Engineer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ataylor.dev
Andrew Taylor - Software Developer
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
singhropar.com
Hushraj Singh - Software Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
burak-kilic.com
Burak Kiliç — Software Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
cowboyim.com
CO Yim - Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
coyim.com
CO Yim - Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
coyim.dev
CO Yim - Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
coyim.io
CO Yim - Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
thebestsoftwaresolution.com
The Best Software Solution
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
techagile.co.uk 🇬🇧
Techagile .NET Software Development
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
albinoloverats.net
albinoloverats ~ Software Development
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
abdrehimmisbah.dev
Abdrehim | Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
owlbytes.dev
OwlBytes - Software Crafters
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.