Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pahatsgroup.com

PahatsGroup · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
etmgroup.co.uk 🇬🇧
ETM Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
66match
adityacatering.com
Aditya Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
66match
bugilsgroup.com
Bugils Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
65match
bucksbargroup.com
Buck's Bar Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
65match
fujintreegroup.com
Fujin Tree Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
64match
absolutelydelicious.com
ADC Catering Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
64match
2bearstaverngroup.com
2Bears Tavern Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
64match
jrrestaurantgroup.com
JR Restaurant Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
64match
achakili.com
Home - Achakili Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
64match
egbeviwo.com
Home - Egbeviwo Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
64match
mozzarestaurantgroup.com
Mozza Restaurant Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
63match
cosmicsaltillo.com
Cosmic Hospitality Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
63match
cosmichospitalitygroup.com
Cosmic Hospitality Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
63match
cosmiccoffeebeer.com
Cosmic Hospitality Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
63match
the-rgroup.com
The R Group – The R Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
63match
advertmerch.com
CRG – Ciccio Restaurant Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
63match
burgerbros.com
Burger Brothers Restaurant Group
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants
63match
burjoborneo.com
Beranda - Borneo Group Indonesia
1 shared topicsbars-and-restaurants

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.