Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to padar.dev

Next.js Portfolio Starter · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
espenmail.com
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
100match
shazsid.com
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
77match
chinbacode.be 🇧🇪
NextPortfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
73match
geevee.dev
Gerardo's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
73match
mohsinatic.com
Mohsinatic | Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
machopiggies.com
MachoPiggies' Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
esbportfolio.com
ESB Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
gchelossi-dev.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
eshaniyer.com
Eshan Iyer — Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
angelicasportfolio.com
Angelica's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
gavinryba.com
Gavin Ryba's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
gaudian.dev
Cameron Gaudian | CS Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
andrewreedhall.com
Andrew Hall's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
isaiahig.com
Isaiah's Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
camhimes.com
Cam Himes | Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
gatikkumar.com
Gatik Kumar | Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
calwjones.com
Callum Jones · Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
estebanlopezp.com
Esteban Lopez - Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.