Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to pacey6.com

Pacey Lau · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
0xshey.com
Shey Laplanche
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
thaske.com
thaske/
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
alexmp.dev
Alexander MP
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
1benw.com
Ben Walker - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
rellsoft.dev
Terrell Turner
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
muhamadfarihan.com
Muhamad Farihan | C#, ASP.NET and Angular Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
reihanian.com
Iman Reihanian ─ developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
alexanderwang.dev
Alexander Wang | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
echessa.com
Joyce Echessa
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
julianbitetto.com
Julian Bitetto
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
brunogeronimo.com
Bruno Geronimo - JavaScript Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
fuadp.dev
Home | fuadp.dev
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
junilliilli.com
Junilliilli devNote
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
alastairtaft.me
Alastair Taft
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
lucyironmonger.com
Lucy Ironmonger
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
lukasbehal.com
Lukas Behal | A software blog of yet another .Net Developer.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
butler1970.com
Robert Butler – Senior Software Engineer / Senior PHP Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
jtreminio.com
Juan Treminio - Senior Web Developer Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.