Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to oyvindg.com

Øyvind Gjersum — Fullstack Developer, Oslo · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
jrayga.com
Jason Rayga — Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
muammars.com
Muammar - Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
alamsyah.org
Alam | Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
sitnic.com
Victor Sitnic — Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
4dmu.dev
4Dmu — Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
1ceit.com
iceit - Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
padusinski.com
Adam Padusiński — Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
fualog.com
Fuad — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
andyvazquez.dev
Andy Vazquez — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ashr.dev
Ashok Raj — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
abids.tech
Abid Shaikh — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
fund-collab.com
Nils Steinmetz | Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
hoelc.com
Christian Höller — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
aaronaperez.dev
Aaron Perez — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
buildwithkode.com
Karthik — Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
pagimos.com
Pagimos - Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
calebjoneser.dev
Caleb Jones — Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
alexishayat.me
Alexis Hayat — Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.