Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to oxmond.com

Cases - Oxmond Technology · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
hmktechnology.com
iHMK Technology
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
atomtechnology.dev
Atom Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
bytscop.com
Bytscop Technology
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
macbeantechnology.co.uk 🇬🇧
MacBean Technology
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
luckyfishtech.co.uk 🇬🇧
Lucky Fish Technology
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
astrosofttech.dev
AstroSoft Technology
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
rsatech.co.uk 🇬🇧
RSA Technology Ltd UK
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
rsatech.uk 🇬🇧
RSA Technology Ltd UK
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
redrosestech.com
Redroses Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
ahari.tech
Technology - Bboxx
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
burttechnologies.com
Burt Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
atomostechnologies.com
Atomos Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
correlltechnologies.com
Correll Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
lorenztechnologies.com
Lorenz Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
theatomosgroup.com
Atomos Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
paladintechnologies.org
Paladin Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
lucasec.com
Home | Lucasec Technologies
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
cacioppo.net
George Cacioppo Technology Blog
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.