Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to oxfordasp.com

OASP Journals · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
oxfordasg.com
OASP Journals
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
77match
abjournals.com
AB Journals
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
acatalystjournal.org
Journal
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
theamericanjournals.com
The USA Journals
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
71match
textandjournal.com
Text and Journal
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
70match
academicjournalscenter.org
Academic Journals Center
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
69match
justineknapp.com
Justine Knapp journaliste
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
69match
pacadpub.com
PACIFIC ACADEMIC JOURNALS
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
69match
signajournal.com
SIGNA - Signa Journal
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
advancedjournaleditors.com
Advanced Journal Editors
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
tharjournal.com
Thar Multidiscipline Journal
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
academicresearchjournals.org
Welcome | Academic Research Journals
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
jusanscience.com
Jusan Science Journal Platform
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
advancedresearchjournal.com
Home - Advanced Research Journal
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
academax.com
Journal Publisher | Academax
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
albasaer.org
Al-Basaer Journal of Business Research
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
academicsquare-pub.com
Academic Square Journal – ~Publisher
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
jvejournals.com
Publisher of Open Access Science Journals - Extrica
1 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.