Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to owlcode.dev

OwlCode - Germán Astudillo · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
alfonsorincon.dev
Alfonso Rincon - Portafolio Personal
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ecodedeveloper-stage.com
<ecode/>
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
holagonzalo.com
Gonzalo García
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
alejandroturriza.dev
Alejandro Turriza
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
abrilcode.com
abrilCode
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
andrewrcr.dev
Andrew Creekmore - Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
andrewcreekmore.dev
Andrew Creekmore - Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
akshit.me
Home - Akshit Kumar (Law Student)
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
ebrar.dev
Ebrar Altunkaynak - Full Stack Developer | ebracodebra.dev
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
pagode.dev
Pagode - Modern Go + React Starter Kit | Pagode
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
achrafsabbar.com
Achraf Sabbar
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
abdulmannan.dev
Abdul Mannan - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
owenmeier.dev
Owen Meier - Computer Science and Economics Student
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
oykucabuk.com
Öykü Çabuk | Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
alexdepasquale.dev
Alex De Pasquale | Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
thanusan.dev
Thanusan | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
acsany.dev
acsany.de - python development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
andrezorn.dev
Andre Zorn
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.