similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to owdevel.com

owdevel (Owen Mak) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

andrewlmartin.dev

AndrewR3K (Andrew) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

jvandort (Justin Van Dort) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

vankxr (João Silva) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Redite · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

sczech (Simon Czech) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Ray Healy · GitLab

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

simonalbrecht (Simon Albrecht) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

AterraEngine · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

lucashecht (Lucas Hecht) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

rpetrich (Ryan Petrich) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

jros92 (Jörg Schmidt) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

lucaspetrini.com

lfpetrini (Lucas Petrini) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

eigenpaul (paul) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

kacperstefaniak.com

MisterCapi (Kacper Stefaniak) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

The Vegan Bug Bakery · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

1nikolas (Nikolas Spiridakis) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

sean-rabbitt (Sean Rabbitt) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

acelaya (Alejandro Celaya) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.