similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to oskarth.com

Oskar Thorén · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

buggen.net – A binary life

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Echorai — Ta kontroll över din digitala identitet

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Freja - din e-legitimation

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Freja - din e-legitimation

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Ali Mansoor | Digital portfolio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Övervakad.com — Massövervakning, integritet & grundlagen i Sverige

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

techskaparna.com

Techskaparna podcast

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

8-GRID IT Consulting & Services GmbH

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

AceIQ - Specialister på digitala arbetsplatser

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

AceIQ - Specialister på digitala arbetsplatser

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Echo Alpha | Securing Autonomous AI

1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

rechengenie.com

Pgari — Projektportal

1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.