Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to oshurek.dev

Anton Oshurek dev · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
rudeshko.com
Anton Rudeshko
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
pilaton.com
Mark Fish | Full-stack developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
kazinoshin.com
Kazi Noshin
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
erenbalci.com
Eren Balcı | Full-Stack Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
sanjudev.com
Sanju's Dev Journey
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
derekblaney.com
Derek Blaney
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
derekcacciotti.com
Derek Cacciotti: iOS and Web Developer- Home
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
iamtinsae.dev
Tinsae - Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
aloks.dev
~/aloks98
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
rudyisme.com
RudyIsMe.com | A blog by Rudy Gnodde
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
karelx.com
Karel Balogh — Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
eriklieben.com
Erik Lieben
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
igagansingh.com
My website | Gagandeep Singh
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
alexanderpech.com
Alexander Pech | Software Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
afridi.dev
Sayeed Afridi - Software Development Engineer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
opinionatedcoder.com
Opinionated Coder | Gian Carlo Pace's Personal Project and Blog Website
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
alexandrempsantos.com
Alexandre Portela dos Santos | learning as we go
3 shared topicsweb-development
63match
germanjablo.com
German's blog
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.