Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to oroman.dev

Roman Onishchenko | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
anuchadev.com
Anucha Ngoenkhao | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
indraarsyk.com
Indra Arsy | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
buraktomruk.com
Burak Tomruk | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
deeksha.io
Deeksha | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
sugatobagchi.com
Sugato Bagchi | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
dpflucas.com
Diogo Lucas | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
antebrink.com
Philip Antebrink – Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ronydev.com
Rony Silva | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
antipotion.com
Antipotion | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
antaresjeet.com
Ranjit | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
nishchay17.com
Nishchay17 – Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ropdias.dev
Rodrigo P. Dias | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
roshanpatil.com
Roshan Patil | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
jesusrosario.com
Jesus Rosario — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
jesusjaviermoreno.com
Jesús Javier Moreno | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
meethamzah.dev
Hamzah Muhammad | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ajsevillano.com
Antonio Sevillano - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
lewismbogo.com
Lewis Mbogo | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.