Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to openwebsecurity.org

Open Web Security · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
datawebsecurity.co.uk 🇬🇧
Data Web Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
75match
restograde.com
Pragmatic Web Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
3qsecurity.io
3Q Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
3qsecurity.com
3Q Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
ns-security.co.uk 🇬🇧
NS Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
securityblues.co.uk 🇬🇧
Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
bdpsecurity.com
BDP Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
isidefensemsp.com
ISI Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
isidefense.com
ISI Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
isidefense-msp.com
ISI Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
isidefense-connect.com
ISI Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
itmsecurity.net
ITM Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
ixpsecurity.com
IXP Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
plrsec.com
PLR Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
pocsec.com
POC Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
bit-security.co.uk 🇬🇧
BIT SECURITY
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
ssgsecurity.co.uk 🇬🇧
SSG Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
opensourcesecurity.co.uk 🇬🇧
Open Source Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.