Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to openweb-berlin.de

Ruby on Rails developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
phillipconrad.de 🇩🇪
Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
1develop.cloud
1Develop
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
1develop.digital
1Develop
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
1develop.app
1Develop
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
1develop.com
1Develop
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
alexbangert.dev
Alex Bangert Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
saarlands-beste.de 🇩🇪
Björn Schmitt - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
arifkobel.com
Arif Kobel | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
sebastian-dernbach.de 🇩🇪
Sebastian Dernbach - Web & App Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
socialweb-development.de 🇩🇪
Webentwicklung, Frontend - Ruby On Rails, Ralph Möcklinghoff
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
quizpoker.de 🇩🇪
Dominik Zoyke - Interactive Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
seo-essen.de 🇩🇪
SEO-Tool Developer: Daniel Abromeit {Portfolio}
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
seo-koeln.de 🇩🇪
SEO-Tool Developer: Daniel Abromeit {Portfolio}
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
payhub.de 🇩🇪
Web based Applications with Ruby on Rails :: Roman Sladeczek
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
kroepl.com
Roman Kröpl · Full-Stack Web & iOS Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
netlabtools.com
Kostenlose Developer-Tools online
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
a-salama.dev
Abdelrahman Salama – Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
personalport.de 🇩🇪
jaysnet development
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.