Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to opensourcepub.com

Open Source Publishing · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
alaincharlesasia.com
ACA Publishing
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
oldhousepublishing.com
OLD HOUSE PUBLISHING
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
ideerpublishing.com
iDEER Publishing
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
solsticeempire.com
Solstice Publishing Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
burnhousepublishing.com
Burn House Publishing
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
oniriapublishing.com
Oniria Publishing
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
oceanicpublishing.com
Oceanic Publishing
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
alenjes.com
Alenjes Publishing
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
macneilpublishing.com
MacNeil Publishing
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
sorianopublishing.com
Soriano Publishing
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
soumyadas.com
JuneOne Publishing Hub
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
amorandipublishing.com
Amorandi Publishing
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
sabystone.com
Saby Stone Publishing Co.
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
sandlotstories.com
ARose Books Publishing
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
ibspublishinghouse.com
IBS Publishing House |
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
sanityquest.com
Sanity Quest Publishing
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
obsidian-ink.com
Obsidian Ink Publishing
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
ruemundklaar.com
Ruem & Klaar Publishing
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.