Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to openmetadata.com

Metadata Technology North America · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
buxtontech.com
Buxton Technologies and Media Inc.
2 shared topicsdatabases
62match
samplecon.com
SampleCon | Where the Future of Data Insights Takes Shape
2 shared topicsdatabases
62match
raitisozols.com
Raitis Ozols - Data Engineer, IT professional
2 shared topicsdatabases
62match
icitai.com
Infocom-Infotech: Innovating with data
2 shared topicsdatabases
61match
objectivebi.com
Tim Walker - objectiveBI Inc
2 shared topicsdatabases
60match
db-system.com
Inicio - DB SYSTEM
2 shared topicsdatabases
40match
dbgenre.com
Technology Blog | dbgenre
1 shared topicsdatabases
39match
dbti.com
Database Technology Home Page
1 shared topicsdatabases
39match
icecavetechnology.com
Ice Cave Technology Home Page
1 shared topicsdatabases
38match
okusibusinessdesktop.com
YaTTI - Indonesian Open Technology Foundation
1 shared topicsdatabases
38match
azuretechllc.com
Azure Technology, LLC | Database Development in Richmond
1 shared topicsdatabases
37match
orrmedia.com
Orr Media Technologies, Inc.
1 shared topicsdatabases
37match
onedbsolutions.com
ONEDB | Solutions Technology Limited
1 shared topicsdatabases
37match
dbspaces.com
dbSpaces Virtual Database Technology
1 shared topicsdatabases
37match
mtantechnologies.com
MTan Technologies LLC | Data Integration & Database Consulting
1 shared topicsdatabases
37match
agrilok.com
AggreLok - Advanced Aggregation Technology
1 shared topicsdatabases
37match
debesystechnologieslcc.com
DEBESYS TECHNOLOGIES LLC
1 shared topicsdatabases
36match
amxcli.com
AMX — Agentic Metadata Extractor
1 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.